Confidential Consultation
Discuss Your Case With Our
Rhode Island Attorneys
Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC represents buyers, sellers, and business owners in Rhode Island business acquisitions and mergers. Our attorneys assist with transaction structure, preliminary agreements, due diligence, purchase agreements, financing coordination, and closing. We help clients identify what is being transferred, how the purchase price will be paid, which obligations each party will accept, and what approvals are needed to complete the transaction.
Buying or selling a business can affect years of work, accumulated assets, employees, customer relationships, and the owner’s future financial plans. A successful negotiation requires attention to the details behind the agreed price. The business’s contracts, debt, ownership records, real estate, licenses, and continuing obligations can all influence the terms of the deal.
Our acquisition work draws on the firm’s business law, contract, real estate, and litigation practices. We coordinate the legal work with the client’s accountant, lender, broker, valuation professional, and other advisers as the transaction requires.

A first-time buyer, an established company acquiring a competitor, and an owner preparing to retire may approach a transaction with different priorities. We begin by identifying the client’s objectives and the proposed arrangement, including whether the transaction involves an entire business, selected assets, a controlling interest, or a smaller ownership stake.
For a buyer, the central questions include whether the business can continue operating as expected, what obligations come with the purchase, and whether financing and required consents can be obtained. For a seller, the review includes payment certainty, continuing exposure after closing, release of personal guarantees, and any commitment to remain involved in the business.
Transactions may involve an asset purchase, a stock purchase, a transfer of limited liability company membership interests, a merger, or a negotiated buyout among existing owners. A partial sale may also require new arrangements for management, voting, distributions, future investment, and the eventual sale of the remaining interest.
The transaction structure affects the property and rights being transferred, the approvals required, the treatment of existing obligations, and the tax consequences. These issues should be evaluated together before the parties commit to a definitive agreement.
| Structure | What changes ownership | Treatment of existing liabilities |
|---|---|---|
| Asset purchase | The assets identified in the purchase agreement. | The buyer assumes specified obligations. Successor-liability rules, liens, and applicable statutes can create additional exposure. |
| Stock or LLC membership interest purchase | Shares or membership interests in the existing entity. | The entity retains its obligations, including undisclosed liabilities. The buyer acquires an ownership interest in that entity. |
| Statutory merger | Entities combine under an approved merger plan. | The surviving or new entity succeeds to the constituent entities’ liabilities under the applicable merger statutes. |
In an asset purchase, the agreement identifies the assets being acquired and the obligations the buyer agrees to assume. The purchased assets may include equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, trade names, intellectual property, customer contracts, goodwill, and real estate. The agreement should also identify excluded assets and liabilities, including items that the seller will retain.
The documents must address how each asset will be transferred. An assignment of a customer contract, a landlord’s consent to a lease assignment, a deed conveying real estate, and a transfer of a domain name involve different requirements. The parties also need to decide how deposits, prepaid expenses, customer credits, outstanding orders, and work in progress will be handled.
An asset purchase does not automatically remove every lien or potential obligation associated with the business. Under Rhode Island’s secured-transactions law, a security interest may continue in transferred collateral unless the secured party authorizes a disposition free of that interest, subject to applicable exceptions. Due diligence and closing arrangements should address the specific assets, liabilities, and required releases.
A purchase of corporate stock or LLC membership interests transfers ownership in the business entity. The entity continues to hold its assets and remains subject to its obligations. The buyer therefore needs a clear understanding of the company’s financial commitments, contractual responsibilities, disputes, tax matters, and ownership history.
The review also includes bylaws, operating agreements, shareholder agreements, transfer restrictions, rights of first refusal, and any approval requirements. A change in ownership can trigger provisions in leases, loan documents, customer agreements, or licenses even when the entity itself remains in place. Those provisions should be examined before the closing date is fixed.
A statutory merger combines entities through a plan and the applicable approval and filing process. The plan addresses the surviving entity, the treatment of ownership interests, and the consideration to be received by the owners. The required steps depend on the entities involved and the law governing each entity.
Rhode Island’s corporate merger statute makes the surviving or new corporation responsible for the merged corporations’ liabilities and preserves creditor rights and liens. The LLC merger provisions contain corresponding rules. Existing debts, claims, and security interests therefore require attention when evaluating a merger.
A direct or forward merger combines the target into the buyer, with the buyer surviving and taking the target’s obligations by operation of law. In a forward triangular merger, the target merges into a subsidiary formed by the buyer, and that subsidiary survives. In a reverse triangular merger, the buyer’s merger subsidiary merges into the target, leaving the target as the surviving subsidiary.
These structures differ in which entity survives and where obligations reside. Using a subsidiary does not eliminate the target business’s liabilities or establish that the parent has no possible exposure. Likewise, keeping the target entity in existence does not establish that every contract, license, or permit will continue without consent. The review must address assignment provisions, change-of-control terms, applicable law, guarantees, and the proposed ownership arrangement.
A consolidation combines the participating businesses into a new entity rather than leaving one existing entity as the survivor. Rhode Island’s corporate statute accommodates this through a merger into a new corporation. The current LLC statute expressly provides for mergers and consolidations. The resulting entity’s succession to liabilities remains part of the analysis. R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 7-1.2-1001, 7-1.2-1005, 7-16-59, 7-16-60, and 7-16-63.
An asset purchase allows the parties to identify what the buyer will acquire and which obligations the buyer agrees to assume. That structure can help define their responsibilities, but the agreement’s label does not resolve every question of successor liability.
In H.J. Baker & Bro., Inc. v. Orgonics, Inc., 554 A.2d 196 (R.I. 1989), the Rhode Island Supreme Court stated the general rule that “a company that purchases the assets of another is not liable for the debts of the transferor company.” Exceptions require attention to both the documents and the circumstances of the transfer.
In Cranston Dressed Meat Co. v. Packers Outlet Co., 57 R.I. 345, 190 A. 29 (1937), the Court recognized responsibility where a purchaser “expressly or impliedly assumed the debts of the old corporation.” The purchase agreement should identify assumed and excluded obligations, and the parties’ conduct should be considered alongside its language.
Rhode Island also recognizes the mere-continuation exception. In H.J. Baker, the Court applied an analysis involving five factors:
The Court imposed liability where the same principal continued the identical business with the same employees, product, and plant. H.J. Baker & Bro., Inc. v. Orgonics, Inc., 554 A.2d 196 (R.I. 1989). These factors require examination together; continuing a product line or retaining employees does not, standing alone, answer the entire successor-liability question.
Fraud also limits the general rule. Cranston Dressed Meat explained that a corporation may succeed to another’s property and business without taking its debts “in the absence of fraud, contract, or statute to the contrary.” 57 R.I. 345, 190 A. 29. The seller’s remaining assets, creditor obligations, consideration received, and relationships among the parties deserve attention when planning the transfer.
The four-exception framework addressing assumed liabilities, de facto merger, mere continuation, and fraudulent transfer appears in Carreiro v. Rhodes Gill & Co., 68 F.3d 1443 (1st Cir. 1995). That decision comes from the federal First Circuit applying Rhode Island law. It concluded that an asset transfer was a prerequisite to the mere-continuation and de facto-merger theories considered there.
The Rhode Island Supreme Court has not adopted the de facto merger exception in the decisions discussed here. In State v. Lead Industries Ass’n, Inc., 951 A.2d 428 (R.I. 2008), the Court decided the matter on other grounds and did not reach the request to adopt that exception. The federal framework therefore should not be treated as a holding that the Rhode Island Supreme Court has adopted every listed exception.
For buyers and sellers, these rules make the underlying facts important. We examine assumed liabilities, consideration, ownership and management relationships, business continuity, and the seller’s ability to address its obligations. Contractual indemnities and exclusions should be evaluated together with creditor rights and the practical ability to collect a remedy.
Legal review is useful while the principal terms are still being developed. A letter of intent can identify the proposed price, structure, included assets, financing conditions, due-diligence period, and anticipated closing date. It can also establish a framework for deciding whether the parties will proceed to a definitive purchase agreement.
Preliminary documents should distinguish the terms intended to be binding immediately from proposals that remain subject to negotiation. Confidentiality, exclusivity, access to records, responsibility for expenses, and dispute provisions may require particular attention. The document’s title alone does not explain the effect of every provision.
For a seller, an exclusivity period can affect the ability to pursue another interested buyer. For a buyer, access to meaningful records and a workable investigation period can determine whether the proposed purchase can be evaluated. We assist with negotiating these arrangements and identifying milestones before the parties incur substantial transaction expenses.
Due diligence is the investigation of the business and the proposed transaction. Its scope should reflect what is being purchased, the industry, the company’s history, the financing, and the risks revealed by the available records. A document request is the beginning of that process; the information must also be evaluated and followed up where it raises unanswered questions.
Recorded lien information is one part of this review. The Rhode Island Department of State’s UCC resources provide access to financing-statement searches and certified search requests. Searches must be evaluated in the context of the debtor, the collateral, the relevant jurisdictions, and other available records.
We coordinate legal diligence with the client’s financial and operational review. Accounting, valuation, engineering, environmental, or industry-specific questions may require other professionals. The findings can lead to a request for further records, a change in the purchase price, additional closing conditions, a specific indemnity, or a decision about whether to proceed.
The stated purchase price does not always equal the amount the seller receives at closing. The agreement should explain the treatment of deposits, assumed debt, debt payoffs, transaction expenses, cash, inventory, working capital, escrows, and any portion of the price payable later.
An adjustment provision should identify the accounts included in the calculation, the applicable accounting methods, the measurement date, and the procedures for preparing and disputing the closing statement. The parties should understand how receivables, obsolete inventory, accrued expenses, and other items affect the calculation. A defined target and consistent methods can make a proposed adjustment easier to evaluate.
An earnout makes part of the price depend on a future event or business result. The agreement should define the measurement, the period involved, the accounting rules, and the buyer’s obligations in operating the business. Revenue, profit, customer retention, and other measures can produce very different outcomes.
Records access, reporting deadlines, treatment of extraordinary expenses, operational changes, and dispute procedures also matter. If the seller will work for the business after closing, the documents should address how an employment or consulting relationship interacts with the earnout and what happens if that relationship ends.
When the seller finances part of the price, the transaction may require a promissory note, security agreement, guarantees, and agreements with another lender. The documents should address payment dates, interest, collateral, default, acceleration, permitted prepayment, and the relationship between payment obligations and any contractual claims.
A buyer using acquisition financing needs loan conditions and transaction conditions to work together. We review financing documents and coordinate lender requirements with the purchase agreement, closing deliverables, payoff arrangements, and funds flow. If there is a senior lender, priority and subordination issues should be resolved before closing.
In an asset transaction, allocating the price among inventory, equipment, real estate, goodwill, and other assets can have different tax consequences for the buyer and seller. We coordinate the agreement’s allocation provisions with the client’s tax adviser, including consideration of IRS Form 8594 when applicable. The allocation should be addressed as part of the transaction negotiations.
The definitive agreement should translate the commercial understanding into enforceable obligations and a workable closing process. We draft, review, and negotiate asset purchase agreements, ownership-interest purchase agreements, merger documents, and the related instruments appropriate to the proposed transaction.
Representations and warranties address matters such as ownership, authority, financial information, contracts, litigation, taxes, and compliance. Disclosure schedules identify exceptions and provide information required by the agreement. Buyers and sellers should review the schedules with the same attention given to the main document.
The agreement may also contain covenants governing the business between signing and closing, requirements for obtaining consents, financing conditions, termination rights, and obligations to deliver specified documents. If signing and closing occur on different dates, the parties need to address what happens if material circumstances change during that period.
Indemnification provisions allocate responsibility for defined losses or claims. Their practical effect depends on the scope of covered matters, notice requirements, claim deadlines, defense procedures, negotiated limits, exceptions, and the available source of payment. Escrows, holdbacks, insurance, and the financial ability of the responsible party can affect the value of a contractual remedy.
For sellers, continuing exposure should be understood before the agreement is signed. For buyers, contractual protection should be evaluated alongside diligence findings and the ability to pursue a remedy. Clear dispute-resolution provisions are especially useful when a later disagreement may involve accounting calculations, an earnout, or the conduct of the business after closing.
We examine governing documents and applicable law to identify the approvals needed for a proposed transaction. Depending on the entity and structure, the work may involve board resolutions, shareholder or member approvals, waivers of transfer restrictions, amendments to governing documents, or a formal plan of merger.
The Rhode Island Department of State’s Articles of Merger or Consolidation instructions identify filing requirements and require an attached plan. The filing process must be coordinated with the transaction documents and the law governing each participating entity. Filing articles does not replace the review of internal authority, contractual consents, or other closing requirements.
Under R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-1.2-1001, a corporate plan of merger identifies the participating corporations and the surviving or newly formed corporation. It states the terms of the combination, explains how shares will be converted, and addresses amendments to the surviving corporation’s articles. The plan establishes what the owners will receive and how the combined business will be organized.
For a merger proceeding through the shareholder-meeting process under R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-1.2-1002, the statutory framework generally requires written notice at least twenty days before the meeting. The notice includes the required plan and dissenters’ rights materials. The ordinary approval standard requires a majority of the shares entitled to vote of each corporation, with separate class voting where applicable. Governing documents, voting interests, and statutory exceptions require review before the parties establish a closing schedule.
Certain mergers follow a different approval route. Section 7-1.2-1002 contains an exception for the surviving corporation when the statutory conditions are satisfied, including no amendment to its articles, issuance of no more than twenty percent of its voting power, and preservation of each shareholder’s same shares with identical rights. Section 7-1.2-1004 separately permits a qualifying parent-subsidiary merger by board resolution when the parent owns at least ninety percent of each class of the subsidiary’s shares.
After the applicable approvals, the articles-of-merger process proceeds under R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-1.2-1003. Common ownership alone does not establish that an exception applies. Internal authorization and state filings must also be coordinated with lender, landlord, licensing, and contractual requirements.
Qualifying shareholders may have statutory rights to dissent and seek payment of the fair value of their shares in certain mergers and sales of all or substantially all corporate assets requiring shareholder approval. R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 7-1.2-1201 and 7-1.2-1202. Eligibility is subject to exceptions, including the statutory market-out provisions for certain exchange-listed or widely held shares.
Preserving these rights requires more than expressing disagreement. The shareholder-meeting procedure includes a written objection before or at the meeting, refraining from voting in favor, and a timely written demand for payment. Section 7-1.2-1202 includes a ten-day demand period following the vote for that procedure. Different notice and demand provisions apply to qualifying mergers completed without a shareholder vote, so the triggering event must be identified for the particular transaction.
For the shareholder-vote procedure, the statute measures fair value as of the day before the vote, excluding appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the merger. It also provides a judicial valuation process when the corporation and shareholder cannot agree. R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-1.2-1202.
Appraisal issues can affect the funds needed to complete the deal and the treatment of dissenting owners. We evaluate eligibility, required notices, valuation procedures, and preservation of rights while the transaction is being planned.
Rhode Island’s current Limited Liability Company Act permits mergers and consolidations involving LLCs, corporations, and limited partnerships, subject to the applicable requirements. R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-16-59. A written plan identifies the participating and surviving or newly formed entities, establishes the terms, explains the conversion of ownership interests, and addresses organizational-document changes. R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-16-60.
An LLC’s articles of organization and operating agreement are central to determining approval requirements. Unless those documents provide otherwise, the current default requires the affirmative vote of members representing a majority of the capital values of all unassigned membership interests. R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 7-16-21 and 7-16-61. This is a capital-value standard, rather than a simple count of individual members. Articles of merger or consolidation are then filed under R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-16-62.
The ownership records, assignment history, operating agreement, and voting provisions should be reviewed before the parties commit to a combination. A negotiated purchase agreement does not resolve a separate question about whether the entity has properly authorized the transaction.
Rhode Island has enacted a replacement Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, Chapter 16.1 of Title 7, effective January 1, 2028. P.L. 2026, chs. 246 and 247. The current Chapter 16 merger provisions remain the operative framework before that transition.
Under the replacement act, the default merger-approval standard changes to approval by all members entitled to vote or consent, subject to the applicable provisions governing variations through an operating agreement. The act also requires separate consent in a record from a member who would bear interest-holder liability after the merger. R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-16.1-1023. Its plan and filing requirements appear in §§ 7-16.1-1022 and 7-16.1-1025.
The expected transaction date and operating agreement therefore deserve particular attention. Owners planning a merger or future ownership exit should evaluate which statutory framework will govern and whether their agreement addresses the applicable approval requirements.
Tax-clearance requirements can affect the closing schedule. For asset transfers covered by R.I. Gen. Laws § 44-11-29, the Division of Taxation must receive the required notice, through a request for a Letter of Good Standing, at least five business days before the sale or transfer. The statute addresses covered transfers, returns, taxes, and exceptions; the requirements must be evaluated for the particular transaction.
The Division advises that a Letter of Good Standing request may take several weeks depending on the taxpayer’s history. The minimum notice period should not be treated as a promised processing time. We coordinate with the client’s accountant concerning the applicable requests, outstanding returns, tax matters, and documents needed for closing.
A Department of State Certificate of Good Standing and a Division of Taxation Letter of Good Standing serve different purposes. The Department of State explains that its Certificate of Good Standing confirms corporate filing status and does not verify that state tax obligations have been satisfied. A closing checklist should identify the particular documents required.
Rhode Island repealed the former UCC Bulk Transfers chapter, R.I. Gen. Laws Chapter 6A-6, effective July 13, 2001. P.L. 2001, ch. 210, § 1. Its former Article 6 notice procedure is therefore not a current requirement for a Rhode Island asset purchase.
That repeal should not be confused with the separate tax-notice and clearance requirements described above. A transaction can fall outside the repealed bulk-transfer procedure and still require notice to the Division of Taxation, tax returns, payment arrangements, lien releases, or other closing steps under applicable law. The closing review must address the actual transaction rather than treating the repeal as eliminating all notice obligations.
Third-party rights need separate attention. Loan documents may restrict a sale or change in ownership. A lease or significant customer agreement may require consent. A license or permit may require an application, approval, or other action before the business can operate under the proposed ownership arrangement.
We review the relevant documents and coordinate the required steps with the closing schedule. Where debt will be paid, the closing should address payoff letters, authorization to release collateral, termination documents, and any continuing guarantees. A transfer agreement between buyer and seller does not, by itself, resolve every third party’s rights.
The premises may be essential to the value of the business. The parties should determine early whether the real estate is included in the sale, owned by a separate entity, or leased from an unrelated landlord. A business acquisition may need to close together with a real estate purchase, a new lease, or an assignment of an existing lease.
Our real estate law practice assists with the property-related aspects of the transaction. Depending on the deal, the review may include title, mortgages and other liens, surveys, access rights, zoning, permitted uses, property conditions, environmental matters, and the terms of a continuing lease.
For leased premises, rent is only one consideration. Renewal options, assignment rights, repair obligations, permitted use, security deposits, landlord approvals, and personal guarantees may materially affect the transaction. The parties should also identify whether the seller remains responsible after an assignment and whether a written release can be obtained.
Where the acquired business has ongoing construction projects, the review may extend to project contracts, receivables, retainage, warranty obligations, equipment, bonding requirements, and project-related claims. Our construction law practice provides a related perspective when those issues are part of the acquisition.
A reorganization may involve changing a business’s legal form or its state of organization. Conversion and domestication procedures can be relevant when preparing a business for sale or organizing an acquisition vehicle. Their availability and effects depend on the entity types and jurisdictions involved.
Rhode Island’s corporate provisions address conversion into a Rhode Island corporation and conversion of a Rhode Island corporation into another entity type or a foreign corporation. R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 7-1.2-1007 and 7-1.2-1008. The current LLC Act similarly addresses conversion into a domestic LLC and conversion of a domestic LLC into another entity or a foreign LLC. R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 7-16-5.1 and 7-16-5.2.
Current Chapter 16 addresses an LLC’s transfer to another jurisdiction through the applicable conversion provisions and contains no separate LLC domestication statute. The replacement act effective January 1, 2028 includes both a conversion provision and an express LLC domestication provision. R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 7-16.1-1041 and 7-16.1-1051.
General partnerships and limited partnerships already have separate conversion and domestication provisions. R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 7-12.1-1141, 7-12.1-1151, 7-13.1-1141, and 7-13.1-1151. Planning must address both jurisdictions’ laws, owner approvals, organizational documents, tax treatment, creditor obligations, licenses, and contracts. The availability of a statutory procedure does not eliminate the need to examine third-party consent requirements.
An owner may sell a portion of a business, buy out another owner, or remain involved after transferring control. These transactions require attention to the ongoing relationship as well as the purchase terms. The parties may need amended operating agreements, shareholder agreements, employment or consulting arrangements, and a plan for a later exit.
Issues to address include management authority, voting rights, access to information, distributions, capital contributions, transfer restrictions, deadlock, and buyout procedures. If the seller retains an interest, the documents should explain what that interest permits the seller to do and what decisions the new controlling owner can make.
Personal guarantees require express attention. Selling an ownership interest does not, by itself, obtain a release from a lender, landlord, or other creditor. The parties should identify existing guarantees and determine whether a release, replacement guarantee, payoff, or another negotiated arrangement is required.
The closing process should bring together the purchase agreement, financing, approvals, consents, releases, transfer instruments, and payment instructions. We coordinate the legal closing documents and review whether the conditions identified in the agreement have been satisfied or appropriately addressed.
Depending on the structure, closing deliveries may include bills of sale, assignments, deeds, ownership-transfer documents, notes, security agreements, resolutions, certificates, payoff documentation, and executed third-party consents. The parties should also plan for delivery of company records, keys, access credentials, customer information, and other materials needed for the transition.
Some obligations continue after the money is transferred. These may include a final working-capital calculation, an earnout report, transition assistance, escrow administration, additional filings, records access, or the handling of a contractual claim. Identifying the responsible person and the deadline for each item helps turn the agreement into a practical transition plan.
Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC approaches acquisition work with attention to both the proposed transaction and the disputes that unclear agreements can create. Our attorneys work with clients to identify material legal issues, explain proposed obligations, and document the business arrangement. The firm’s related business, real estate, construction, and litigation practices inform that work.
Partner Ryanna T. Capalbo handles contract, business, and litigation matters, including LLC member and shareholder disputes. Her practice also includes creditor and lender matters, collections, workouts, and transactional work. These areas are relevant when reviewing contractual obligations, ownership relationships, existing debt, and the allocation of responsibility in a business transaction.
Partner Andrew R. Bilodeau combines his legal practice with an MBA and more than 30 years of entrepreneurial experience. His work includes business formation, financing, acquisitions, sales, and contract negotiation, together with business and commercial litigation. His experience owning and operating businesses informs his approach to the operational and contractual issues that buyers and sellers need to address.
Involving counsel while the initial terms are being developed allows legal issues to be considered before the parties commit to exclusivity, deposits, deadlines, or other obligations. Useful starting documents include the proposed terms, any letter of intent, organizational documents, financial information already exchanged, and the agreements affecting the business or its location.
No single structure is preferable in every transaction. The choice depends on the business, its obligations, transfer requirements, tax considerations, financing, and the parties’ objectives. An asset transaction requires careful identification and transfer of the purchased assets. An ownership-interest transaction requires close review of the entity that the buyer will own.
The parties can negotiate continuing ownership, employment, consulting, or transition assistance where appropriate. Each role should be documented clearly. Compensation, authority, duration, termination rights, confidentiality, and the relationship to any deferred purchase-price payments should be addressed together.
The parties should investigate the applicable terms early and determine whether consent, a replacement agreement, a different structure, or another negotiated solution is available. If the arrangement is essential to the business, the purchase agreement should address its effect on the closing conditions and the parties’ rights if approval is not obtained.
Seller financing can be part of a negotiated deal. The parties need to address the amount financed, repayment terms, security, default remedies, and coordination with any acquisition lender. The seller should also evaluate the practical ability to collect the deferred price, while the buyer should understand how the payment obligations affect the business after closing.
The timeline depends on the availability and condition of records, diligence findings, financing, negotiations, approvals, tax clearance, and third-party consents. A transaction with incomplete ownership records or an essential consent still outstanding may require additional work. We help identify the steps that need to occur and coordinate the legal work with the proposed closing schedule.
Bring the proposed terms or offer, any signed preliminary agreement, the entity’s organizational documents, ownership information, available financial statements, debt information, and significant contracts or leases. Identify your objectives, anticipated financing, desired closing date, and any known dispute or consent issue. These materials help define the legal work needed for the transaction.
If you are considering buying a business, selling an ownership interest, negotiating a partner buyout, or combining companies, Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC can assist with the legal aspects of the proposed transaction. Our Rhode Island business acquisitions and mergers attorneys work with buyers, sellers, and business owners from preliminary negotiations through closing and related post-closing matters.
Call 401-300-4055 or contact Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC to discuss your proposed transaction.