Confidential Consultation
Discuss Your Case With Our
Rhode Island Attorneys
Domestic violence can create urgent questions about personal safety, contact with children, access to a shared home, and the next court hearing. Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC’s Rhode Island restraining order lawyers help clients evaluate available protective relief, prepare court filings, and address related family law issues. The appropriate proceeding depends on the parties’ relationship, their ages, the conduct involved, and any existing orders.
If you or someone else is in immediate danger, call 911. An emergency response and a request for a court order serve different purposes. A pending court application should not delay seeking emergency assistance.
Rhode Island permits a qualifying person to seek civil domestic-abuse protection independently of a divorce. R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-15-2 expressly makes Family Court domestic-abuse proceedings independent of divorce proceedings and preserves other available civil and criminal remedies. A person does not have to decide to end a marriage before addressing a request for protection.
A civil protective order, a criminal no-contact order, and orders entered in a divorce case may operate at the same time. Each must be reviewed on its own terms. Our attorneys examine the existing cases together so that requested relief addresses the client’s circumstances and any overlapping restrictions.
The domestic-abuse definitions in § 15-15-1 and § 8-8.1-1 include causing or attempting physical harm, creating fear of imminent serious physical harm, compelled sexual relations through force or duress, and stalking or cyberstalking. The qualifying relationship also matters.
A useful factual account identifies what happened, when and where it happened, the words or actions involved, and why protection is requested. Repeated messages, surveillance, threats, or unwanted contact should be described with their surrounding circumstances. The court evaluates the statutory requirements; a general label such as “harassment” does not supply the underlying facts.
The Family Court statute includes present and former spouses, relatives by blood or marriage, and people who are legal parents of a child together. Its categories also include certain substantive dating or engagement relationships within the past year involving a minor or an adult plaintiff who is a parent of minor children. The parties do not necessarily have to share a child for the latter provision to apply. Matters involving a child therefore require careful review of the family relationships and requested protection.
The District Court statute covers qualifying cohabitants and substantive dating or engagement relationships within the preceding year. Its cohabitant definition addresses age, lack of a blood or marriage relationship, the absence of shared legal parentage, and living together currently or within the preceding three years. The specific facts must be considered alongside the Family Court provisions when selecting the court.
Certain disputes between unrelated adults who have no relevant dating relationship may belong in Superior Court under its civil injunction procedures. The Superior Court’s restraining-order guidance explains that these proceedings differ from Family and District Court domestic-abuse orders. It also directs landlord-tenant matters to District Court. Superior Court relief has its own requirements and enforcement procedure.
Court selection should be resolved before preparing a complaint. A description of the relationship, dates of cohabitation or dating, children’s ages, and copies of existing orders can help identify the appropriate filing.
A civil domestic-abuse case begins with a complaint requesting protective relief. A criminal no-contact order arises in connection with a criminal proceeding. Section 12-29-4 provides for no-contact orders when a person arrested or charged with a domestic-violence offense is released before arraignment, and for consideration of the order at arraignment or a bail hearing. It also makes clear that prosecution is determined by the prosecutor.
The District Court’s pretrial guidance explains that a no-contact order is a condition of bail and can prohibit direct and indirect contact, including messages through other people. The court’s criminal-case guidance directs a protected person seeking removal to the process for appearing before a judicial officer. A private agreement or an invitation to communicate should not be treated as a change to the order.
When more than one order exists, a change in one case does not establish that the other restrictions have ended. The current written orders should be checked before arranging contact, collecting belongings, or changing a parenting exchange.
Section 15-15-4 and § 8-8.1-4 permit temporary relief without advance notice when the required specific facts establish immediate and irreparable harm before notice and a hearing can occur. This is commonly called an ex parte order. The affidavit or verified complaint must explain the immediate concern.
Under these statutes, an order entered without notice initially lasts for the period the court specifies, up to twenty-one days, subject to the applicable extension provisions. A further hearing addresses the request for continuing relief. The date on the actual order and hearing notice controls what the parties must do next; a temporary order does not automatically become a final order.
The statutes also provide procedures for relief when the court is unavailable after business hours. Family Court emergency relief may be communicated through law enforcement and ordinarily expires at the close of the next business day unless the judge grants longer relief. Anyone receiving an emergency order should promptly confirm the follow-up filing and hearing requirements. Superior Court civil temporary injunctions follow separate procedures.
Family Court’s protective-order statute authorizes relief addressing contact, abuse, exclusion from a household, household animals, and custody of the parties’ minor children. It also authorizes limited child-support relief after notice and a hearing. The statute contains firearm surrender and possession restrictions. Requests should identify the people, locations, and practical arrangements requiring the court’s attention.
District Court relief includes restrictions on contact and abuse and statutory firearm requirements. Its authority to require someone to leave a residence contains an express exception when the defendant holds the sole legal interest. Housing relief should therefore be evaluated using the applicable statute and the actual ownership or lease arrangement.
The signed order determines the restrictions in a particular case. A request for protection should address contact at home, work, or school when relevant, and explain any necessary arrangements involving children. Firearm-related threats or access should be identified for the court’s consideration.
Preparation begins with a clear account of the incidents and the relief requested. Family Court domestic-abuse complaints may be filed without a filing fee under § 15-15-2. The District Court also provides a filing-fee-free domestic-abuse process and courthouse advocates who assist with forms. Attorney fees and other potential costs are separate questions.
Service is an important part of the proceeding. Section 15-15-4.1 and § 8-8.1-4.2 address personal service, the return documenting service attempts, and court-authorized alternatives when diligent efforts have failed. The statutes provide for a new hearing date and extension of the temporary order when the court orders an alternative method. Use the authorized process rather than approaching the defendant to deliver the papers yourself.
For the hearing, useful preparation may include:
Our attorneys assess which records and witnesses address the legal issues, prepare the client to testify, and address contrary evidence. The court determines whether to grant relief and what terms are justified.
The Family and District Court domestic-abuse statutes provide for relief for a fixed period of up to three years and permit extension on the plaintiff’s motion when further protection is necessary. They also allow modification on a party’s motion. These provisions appear in § 15-15-3 and § 8-8.1-3. A final order is therefore not a promise of permanent relief.
Review the expiration date well in advance. The District Court statutory notice expressly directs a person seeking continued protection to apply for renewal before expiration. If circumstances change, seek the appropriate court modification and obtain the resulting written order. Informal arrangements should not be used to work around restrictions that remain in effect.
Violations of qualifying Family or District Court domestic-abuse orders can lead to contempt and criminal consequences. Under § 15-15-3 and § 8-8.1-3, actual notice is relevant to the criminal violation provision. Willful violation of a criminal domestic-violence no-contact order is separately addressed by § 12-29-4.
The Superior Court distinguishes its ordinary civil restraining orders: violation of that civil order is addressed through the court’s civil enforcement process, rather than treated as a criminal offense merely because the order was violated. The underlying conduct may present separate issues. Identifying the issuing court and type of order is essential when evaluating enforcement.
Report immediate danger to police and preserve available evidence of an alleged violation without putting yourself at risk. Keep a copy of the current order accessible. Our attorneys can review the order and incident records and evaluate appropriate enforcement proceedings.
Both § 15-15-3 and § 8-8.1-3 allow a plaintiff to request limits on release of the plaintiff’s address. This requires attention to the particular request and court order; it should not be assumed that every document in a case is confidential.
Tell counsel how you can safely receive calls, messages, and documents. Before submitting exhibits, identify addresses or other sensitive details requiring review. Preserve original messages and complete conversations when possible, and avoid editing or deleting relevant material. Evidence collection should never involve confronting another person or accessing an account without authorization.
Protective relief may need to be coordinated with an existing custody or parenting arrangement. Our review considers who is protected, whether the order restricts communication about the children, and whether the requested arrangements can operate consistently with other court orders. Parenting exchanges, school access, and necessary communication should be addressed through clear terms rather than informal exceptions.
A person served with a protective order also needs prompt advice about compliance, the hearing, and any request to contest or modify the order. Review every page, preserve relevant records, and use the court process to raise objections. Disagreement with an allegation does not provide permission to disregard an existing order.
Partner Ryanna T. Capalbo leads Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC’s family law practice. Our representation includes assessing the appropriate court and available relief, preparing complaints and supporting statements, organizing hearing evidence, and addressing renewal, modification, or enforcement questions. When criminal and family proceedings overlap, we identify the separate orders and issues that must be considered.
Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC · Family Law Resource
For parents who also want information about potential child support payments, Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC offers a Rhode Island Child Support Calculator. It provides preliminary weekly and monthly estimates for supported income levels and standard parenting arrangements.
The calculator is a limited educational resource. It does not address immediate safety concerns, determine protective relief, or change any court order.

To discuss a Rhode Island protective or restraining order matter, call Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC at 401-300-4055 or contact our firm.